A couple of my columns toward the end of last year provoked questions that I really should answer here and now, to tie up the loose ends of 1998. There are essentially two questions:
The Rebol programming language sounds interesting, but why would I want to use it instead of, say, Python?
and:
Swaine, you ignorant heathen, don't you realize that the millenium bug is really a centennial bug and would cause trouble even if this were only a century rollover that we were approaching rather than a millenium tick; and that the millenium doesn't even come on January 1, 2000 but on January 1, 2001; and that changing the calendar or converting to Zoroastrianism or whatever wouldn't solve the problem anyway?
To the latter I say: "Yes, I know that." I might even add: "Doh!"
To answer the former, I went to the source: The developers of Rebol. Here's what they said, rephrased in my words so that I can feel like I'm earning my pay:
Rebol was created to be a network messaging language, rather than a system scripting language like Python. It was specifically designed to handle the passing of messages over the Internet and other such heterogenous, distributed environments.
Rebol is platform independent. Python is not.
Rebol is a context-sensitive language; Python is context-free. That's a distinction from language theory that is more often invoked by linguistics professors than computer programmers; in practice, what it means is that Rebol can often infer context that programmers using
Python and most other languages would have to supply explicitly.
And Rebol is 250K. Python is 2.3 megs. So you can easily download Rebol. Since it's free, I recommend you do, and take a look at it.
Finally, in that same spirit of tying up loose ends, and in the timeworn tradition of making New Year's resolutions, I hereby resolve not to pass on to you any more unsubstantiated rumors from Robert X. Cringely. Unless they're really, really juicy.
-oo-
Mike is the co-author ofFire in the Valley, the definitive history of the personal computer.