Dr. Dobb's is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Channels ▼

Community Voices

Dr. Dobb's Bloggers

Mac Security

March 18, 2008

Apple does a pretty good job keeping itself in the news, so normally I don't feel they need my help. But a couple of recent news items seem significant. The first is the news that Apple is making pretty significant inroads in US personal computer market share. They're at 14%, up from 9% this time last year. That's a huge jump in one year.

The second bit of news is the cornucopia of security fixes Apple released yesterday: 90 or so vulnerabilities were patched, split roughly in half between Mac OS X and the Safari browser.

Now, I don't think these two items are necessarily linked at the moment, but I suspect that if Apple continues to see this kind of growth, these two sorts of news stories will indeed be linked in the future. Apple has been practicing its own brand of security-through-obscurity for years—its market share has remained low enough that it has never made much sense to target malicious code at Macs.

Before you yell at me, yes, I know the BSD underpinnings of Mac OS X have some inherent security advantages as well. But I doubt that's the main reason for the relative lack of Mac attacks in the wild.

Of course, a 14% market share isn't a much bigger security target than a 9% market share, so I'm not worried yet. But as a Mac user, I almost wish Apple would stay off the radar screen, security-wise. I'm quite sure my network of machines at home is not anywhere near as secure as it could be (so please, enterprising hackers out there, don't feel compelled to prove it to me), but I certainly haven't had the kinds of problems that my PC-using friends have had. Trust me: this isn't arrogance. I know my day is coming, especially if Apple gets any more successful.

Related Reading

More Insights

Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.