Channels ▼


Bulletproofing C++ Code

Source Code Accompanies This Article. Download It Now.

Step 4: Static Analysis and Code Review

To complete the loop, any new code needs to be analyzed by the same static-analysis process that was established in Step 1. Ideally, programmers perform static analysis on their desktops so that they can check and correct code before committing it to source control. Even if this is not possible, the new code—once it is committed to source control—is still subject to static analysis when the batch process checks all code available in the code base.

Once the new code passes all the checks, including a clean bill of health from static analysis and regression testing with sufficient coverage, it should be finalized by a team code review. It does not really matter how the code review is conducted—it can be integrated into the code-authoring process (as in pair programming), distributed to programmers with automatic notification based on source-control commits, or performed in the old-fashioned manner by gathering people into a room with code printouts. The key is to have the code reviewed by humans.


This four-step process illustrates how C++ development teams can approach the common C++ development tasks of managing and modifying unfamiliar legacy code in a way that promotes a methodical approach and yields high-quality results. Although each of the techniques I introduce is a good practice on its own, combining them in an automated process framework helps teams effectively address their productivity and code-quality goals, as well as confidently manage development risks. Further gains can be realized by monitoring and continually improving the process.

Related Reading

More Insights

Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.