Channels ▼

Al Williams

Dr. Dobb's Bloggers

Arms in the Clouds

March 09, 2013

Recently I was lamenting about how hard it is to roll your own ARM development toolchain. Of course, a recent trend in consumer applications is to have things "in the cloud" — like Gmail, for example. That would be one answer: Have your development tool hosted by someone else and access it from the Internet.

More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

This isn't an original idea. I've written about MBed before. It has an online-style IDE. There are quite a few general IDEs like Cloud9 and several others. I was recently impressed, however, with Arrow's Cloud Connect.

Cloud Connect is an ARM Cortex M0 IDE on the Web. It specifically targets a development board from Freescale known as "Freedom". This is a nice little board running at 48MHz, with 128K of flash and 16K of RAM. Like many of these inexpensive boards it has a few I/O devices (an accelerometer, a capacitive input device, and a three-color LED).

Cloud Connect gives you an IDE that can generate code for the board. It also has example code libraries and can interface with iDigi to put your connected device data on a graphical dashboard in a web browser.

I may pick up a Freedom board and try it. If I do, I'll write about it in a future update. But meanwhile, this brings up an interesting question. If I'm just fooling around, a web IDE is very attractive. It also would help me when I'm working with students who probably aren't going to spend a day installing software (nor are they going to buy an expensive development environment). But for commercial use — employers or clients — I'm not convinced I could make the case that letting someone else host my development environment was the right move.

Of course, even the biggest companies get hacked. But it is really more than just security concerns. If I am up against a deadline and my computer goes down, I like to have someone working to fix it that has some skin in the game. There are other concerns too, like working offline.

On the other hand, for some quick non-critical prototyping, these kinds of IDEs are handy. Code Connect appears to be aimed at one particular board, but it isn't hard to imagine a vendor providing such a tool general enough for any target in their CPU family.

Would you use a cloud-based IDE? Or do you? Leave a comment and tell your story.

Related Reading






Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Comments:

ubm_techweb_disqus_sso_-0cd02431100cced55cb6ba2793570183
2013-03-14T06:06:09

Only if forced to do so.

Even though I do get to do quite some web development, I am for local applications and see the web for documents only as it was originally designed.


Permalink
ubm_techweb_disqus_sso_-0e01bbcf109d7c66657e1a795586fe9e
2013-03-13T18:28:04

Wow, I've been away from embedded for too long. As a student in the early '80s, embedded labs were a pain. Development was done on HP development stations that cost as much as a car - you signed up for lab time, and hoped the code was correct. As a grad student in the early '90s, things weren't much better. Dev boards cost several hundred dollars, and the toolchain was almost as much - even the crippled "student" editions.

The Freedom you linked to is $14 qty 1! Coupled with an open source or cloud IDE/toolchain, even a student can afford to experiment with several families.

I'd still prefer the open source, locally hosted toolchain. I'd like the flexibility to work offline, the ability to use the same frontend with many targets, and the ability to backup and access projects' data in many places.


Permalink


Video