Dr. Dobb's is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Channels ▼

Community Voices

Dr. Dobb's Bloggers

Windows and Fresh Air

June 28, 2008

The NY Times Sunday Business section Jun 29th had an interesting article by Randall Stross that posed the question should Microsoft rewrite Windows completely for its future. He contrasts Microsoft against Apple and what they did with OS-X and also talks about an OS project at Microsoft called Singularity. Articles and blogs on what Microsoft should do for the Future are many but this is the first I had seen where there was discussion of new efforts within Microsoft itself.

I am a user of operating systems not an expert in them, but like most users over the years, I am grown too familiar with the issues around Windows and how those issues impact my work and my customers. 

Vista is not an option for me. I worry that Windows 7 will be more of the same, bigger, slower, and more incompatible. Windows XP gets my work done, but it is also clear where XP is going and XP also has its own set of issues.

Stross's article talks about Singularity being conducted by the research arm and not the Windows group so is safely bottled up. I can't say if Singularity is the answer, but I know the issues with Windows all too well to see the value in developing a new OS from scratch. Stross argues that this could be Microsoft's future, and I can't disagree.

I would like to see more information on Singularity get out sufficient to get discussion going both outside and inside Microsoft. Perhaps we need to aid the rebels within Microsoft to get more attention on this issue as well as provide pressure for change.

Stross refers to Windows OS X developed as a rewrite along the Mac OS X model. Makes sense to me. 


Related Reading

More Insights

Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.