Dr. Dobb's is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Channels ▼
RSS

Parallel

Q&A: Intel VP Pat Gelsinger


CRN: Intel shared the stage at IDF with Apple. How will Intel's relationship with Apple evolve in 2007, or is the cooperation mostly finished?

GELSINGER: It's far from done. Let's take it in phases. First was the honeymoon, where we won Apple as a customer. The second phase was execution and getting products done and, third, we just finished that. The MacBook Pro was the last product. We just finished the birthing. We've just gotten that done, but a number of projects are under way with Apple on next-generation technologies -- but I can't detail those. Apple is very secretive, even to us. It's the nature of the company.

CRN: Has Microsoft expressed concern about the Intel-Apple pairing or frowned at your relationship with yet another new operating-system vendor besides Linux?

CRN: Well, certainly, of course. They look at it that way. But our response [to Microsoft] is that we have a customer that wants to use our silicon. Of course we support them. At the same time, I'd say our Microsoft relationship is as good if not better than it has been in our 20-year history.

CRN: Why?

GELSINGER: We both see that we might have border quibbles on a particular issue, but if the PC industry is not good for [Microsoft], then it's not good for us. That shared challenge and opportunity [for Intel and Microsoft] is significant. We have a mutual view of the business market [and grapple with issues like] what does it take to address security and management? We share common views of the next problems and hurdles to enable that. We have a common perspective on how to get to the next layer of growth.

CRN: Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, co-founder and chief software architect, announced earlier this year that he will step down from his day-to-day role at the company by July 2008. Given that you've worked with him directly for years, do you think his absence will affect Intel's relationship with Microsoft? And to what extent has Intel worked on the technical side with current Microsoft Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie?

GELSINGER: Bill is innovative, brilliant, ruthless, aggressive, demanding and challenging. You can't take a figure like that and remove him from the company and not expect the company to be different or the relationship to be different. I meet with lots of industry execs, and I don't need to be briefed as well for any other as well as when I meet with Bill. He's smart, aggressive and does his homework.

Sometimes I show up for a meeting [with Gates], and he knows more about some aspects of my product than I do. He's a force. So you have to look at it and say, 'Wow, if he steps aside, Microsoft will change.' Everyone recognizes that, but at same time, Microsoft is much bigger than Bill. There are many brilliant people there, like CTO Craig Mundie. And I've known Ray [Ozzie] since Lotus and worked with him through the Notes days and have a great relationship with him. I just had dinner with him a few weeks ago. Ray is brilliant.

CRN: What did you talk about over dinner? Enabling software-as-a-service?

GELSINGER: Yes, that was certainly one of the topics, [as well as] Microsoft Live and Microsoft's data center visions for the future. Ray, as a practicing software developer, is probably the best in the world, and he is a very deep thinker with respect to many aspects of software and software architecture. But he's also a very congenial person. He doesn't have that incredible external intensity as Bill, so he's a different personality. He will be a tremendous person for Microsoft, and I look forward to working with him a lot more going forward.

NEXT: The impact of the Windows Vista launch and virtualization technology.


Related Reading


More Insights






Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.