Channels ▼
RSS

Tools

What's Behind Attachmate's Acquisition of Novell


Yesterday's late breaking IT news featured reports that Attachmate had announced plans to buy Novell for $2.2 billion. After months of speculation as just exactly when Novell would get bought, a deal finally appears to have been tabled that represents a 50% premium over Novell’s valuation at the beginning of this year.

As one of the largest open source vendors with its SuSE product line, Novell's inflated price valuation has surprised many industry commentators who have likened it to the hefty $7 billion price tag placed on Sun by Oracle. Suggestions are that Sun's $1billion MySQL acquisition helped increase its final valuation. So in this case, would Novell be valued so highly if all it had to sell were NetWare and GroupWise, which are arguably not exactly cutting edge technologies?

"This acquisition does not make a lot of sense for Attachmate. No one sees any product or market synergy in this deal. But it does make sense for Attachmate’s investors, Francisco Partners, Golden Gate Capital, and Thoma Bravo who are getting their hands on a golden nugget — a leading open source product, well deployed and with deep open source know-how. Open source is the next generation model for producing software, and Attachmate’s investors understand that. By acquiring Novell, they are buying their ticket into this market and they certainly intend to leverage this opportunity beyond just SuSE," said Bertrand Diard, cofounder and CEO of Talend.

Diard went on to suggest that the ironic component of this deal is Microsoft’s involvement. After fighting open source for many years, Microsoft is now embracing it. Nobody knows which Novell patents Microsoft is getting as part of the deal now, but it will be interesting to see how much they contribute to Microsoft’s open source strategy.

"At the end of the day, this acquisition is good news. It proves one more time that open source creates opportunities for investment, and that open source vendors can thrive, grow, and play on the enterprise scene," said Diard.


Related Reading


More Insights






Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Video