Dr. Dobb's is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Channels ▼

Eric Bruno

Dr. Dobb's Bloggers

Application Approval. A Scary Trend?

March 29, 2010

When Apple launched the iPhone with AT&T as its partner, it later introduced the iPhone SDK and the application store. However, as you probably know, applications must be submitted to Apple for approval before being allowed in the application store. This means you, as a developer, need to risk non-approval based on Apple's nebulous approval process. It also means that you, as an iPhone user, may not have access to certain useful applications because Apple didn't approve it. Some applications that were not approved include those that had questionable content, and others that were deemed competitive to existing iPhone applications. The first reason makes some sense, but the second reason is quite scary.

Apple's justification for the approval process was to protect AT&T's network from errant applications. That seemed reasonable enough, and although there were those who complained about being disapproved, most have been tolerant of this requirement. However, the application store and its approval process seems to still exist even for the iPad. Why would it be needed, especially for the WIFI model? For instance, the WIFI model really is just a computer, like a MacBook without a keyboard. For that matter, so is an iPod Touch -- there's no cell carrier's network to protect in either case.

This is a concerning trend, where application approval by Apple on its products has grown beyond the reasoning to protect the iPhone carrier's cell network. What's next, application approval for all Apple products, including its Macs? Although it's intriguing to think that all applications must meet some sort of minimal set of requirements and testing before you're ever exposed to them (i.e. eliminating potential malware), it's concerning that a single company could control this. Personally, even if it were a consortium of independent parties running the application approval process, I'd still be somewhat concerned. However, such a process could be used to stamp an application as "Tested and Approved", knowing that it passed a set of tests that check for things such as the presence of malware. But I still prefer a free market for third-party applications on the computers (of all shapes and sizes) that I buy.

I'm curious to see how the approval process plays out for Apple products like the iPad. It can either turn into a concerning trend, or a process to test and label applications as meeting a level of quality. As owners and users of these products, it's my opinion that we need to fight for a free and open application marketplace.

Happy coding! EJB

Related Reading

More Insights

Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.