Dr. Dobb's is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Channels ▼

Community Voices

Dr. Dobb's Bloggers

Technical Job Interviews

January 20, 2010

What is the best way to interview for software developer positions?  I've been on both sides of the job interviewing table, but have been on the interviewee side of some not too  great interviews recently.  They are somewhat reminiscent of back when I was fresh out of college and looking for an entry level position.  I'm just not a great interviewer, it would seem, but this gets me to thinking about things more critically because, honestly, I think I'm a decent software engineer.  So is it that the most common interview processes don't accurately gauge developer talent?

It seems that the most common interview technique is white boarding problems.  I'm not going to delve too deeply into my abysmal white boarding skill, but it seems like even the most accomplished artisan would have trouble with this medium.  I think it's difficult to write programs on anything where you can't insert lines in the middle or shift things  around.  But my biggest question about this approach, though, is does this accurately predict how a person may perform on the job?  Personally, I think it would be more indicative of how a person may perform under immediate pressure, which, in my experience, doesn't come up too frequently whilst developing software.  Sure you occasionally have a fire to put out, but even then, you don't have someone looking over your shoulder and critiquing you along the though process.

I recognize that a lot of this may be closely related with how invested a company wants to get with their candidates--there's never really enough time or people to conduct all these interviews, so long drawn out processes are bad.  But I have to believe that at least giving a candidate a little bit of time to think about a problem before hand would allow for a more accurate reflection of his or her ability.  Maybe even a bit of homework.  Am I wrong?

What techniques do you think work best? 

Related Reading

More Insights

Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.